Showing posts with label Keith Olbermann. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keith Olbermann. Show all posts

Monday, November 8, 2010

Bipartisanship?


I found this image when perusing around in the "Reinstate Keith Olbermann" page on Facebook (he has since been reinstated, by the way. Looks like Mr. Griffin had a little realization about ratings?) It just makes me laugh. Pretty much sums up the state of political discourse lately. Surely the biggest challenge after the "lame-duck" session of congress will be how to get anything done with a split congress.

The mainstream media likes to compare past and present, but I think every congress is a little different. I think there will be a strain not only between left and right, but right and right. You have a huge influx of freshman congressmen and women who's primary allegiance is to the tea party, not necessarily the republican establishment. So who do they get behind? Jim DeMint or Mitch McConnell? This doesn't really look good for bipartisanship. Considering the midterms basically wiped out all of those "blue-dog democrats" who strove to find middle ground with moderate republicans (also few of those now), it seems like this congress is going to be pretty polarized. I think this plays politically well for the Democrats, if and only if they can get in line and make it clear what they want to do. Democrats have a bit of a message problem, and a bigger problem in communicating their NUMEROUS successes. Check out THIS for a comedic list of said accomplishments.

If President Obama and the Democratic party can get a little better at bragging about their accomplishments, the 2012 elections look good, presidentially and taking-back-congress wise. There is a lot of work to be done. For instance, you can't really brag about healthcare until you have cleaned up some of the misinformation about it that is still out there (death panels making a comeback, oh my!). Republicans are going to always have a slight advantage in this field because there is no mistaking the fact that Fox's lineup is in the bag for the Republicans. Millions of dollars and free campaigning in the bag.
I would reccomend the Obama administration be proactive about this. Don't begin the campaign today, you still have lots of work to be done, However, get your message out. Rallies, appearences, youtube videos? Rekindle the fire of 2008 and get your soldiers out there (like me!). Plan ahead, and by 2012 maybe the national conversation could be a little more...informed?

Don't worry too much about bipartisanship. Hold out your hand for them, sure. But expect it to be swatted. Until the republicans feel like ACTUALLY discussing issues, actually coming up with real-world solutions, don't let them take control of the discussion. Those of us who know things like tax cuts for millionaires actually INCREASES the deficit can see right through their concers about fiscal responsiblity (laughable!). Democrats are still the adults, as far as I'm concerned.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Politics as usual

Anyways, Keith Olbermann is suspended form MSNBC. Indefinitely, without pay. That sounds pretty scary but apparently there is no indication he will be fired. Because:

1. MSNBC would have to have completely lost their collective minds to fire their highest rated program. Really. Keith's show is the only one who rivals Faux noise. (Not even trying to deny Fox has the highest ratings. They do.)

2. Keith Olbermann's show is an opinion show. It would be hard to argue that he has ever been neutral in any sense of the word. By this same logic, Joe Scarborough, also a host on msnbc, is allowed to donate 3x as much to REPUBLICANS (oh noez!!?!) because his show is labeled "opinion". What?

3. This is all really a ploy to show how MSNBC is different from FOX. Ooohhhkaayy, Phil Griffin. Point made. Bring back Keith. Sign the petition.

Also, Obama's trip to India will not be costing taxpayers 200 mil a day. If you ever heard Michele Bachmann open her mouth and trusted anything that came out, you should probably get your head checked. But just in case:
Another failed factcheck for Ms. Bachman

"Reading it on the internet" doesn't make it true! There are a lot of fun things you can read on the internet. Don't even need to go into that right now. But conservatives seem to think that's enough of a citation, and they can repeat it on national TV. Phil Griffin did you need another reason why MSNBC is different than Fox? You have researchers on the payroll. Zing.

This is insane.And when pressed about it, she replied she had "read it somewhere" and that was enough for the interviewer. Ohhh, you read it somewhere. Did you write it down on your hand and read it there? Oh no, thats Palin's game...