Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts

Monday, November 8, 2010

Bipartisanship?


I found this image when perusing around in the "Reinstate Keith Olbermann" page on Facebook (he has since been reinstated, by the way. Looks like Mr. Griffin had a little realization about ratings?) It just makes me laugh. Pretty much sums up the state of political discourse lately. Surely the biggest challenge after the "lame-duck" session of congress will be how to get anything done with a split congress.

The mainstream media likes to compare past and present, but I think every congress is a little different. I think there will be a strain not only between left and right, but right and right. You have a huge influx of freshman congressmen and women who's primary allegiance is to the tea party, not necessarily the republican establishment. So who do they get behind? Jim DeMint or Mitch McConnell? This doesn't really look good for bipartisanship. Considering the midterms basically wiped out all of those "blue-dog democrats" who strove to find middle ground with moderate republicans (also few of those now), it seems like this congress is going to be pretty polarized. I think this plays politically well for the Democrats, if and only if they can get in line and make it clear what they want to do. Democrats have a bit of a message problem, and a bigger problem in communicating their NUMEROUS successes. Check out THIS for a comedic list of said accomplishments.

If President Obama and the Democratic party can get a little better at bragging about their accomplishments, the 2012 elections look good, presidentially and taking-back-congress wise. There is a lot of work to be done. For instance, you can't really brag about healthcare until you have cleaned up some of the misinformation about it that is still out there (death panels making a comeback, oh my!). Republicans are going to always have a slight advantage in this field because there is no mistaking the fact that Fox's lineup is in the bag for the Republicans. Millions of dollars and free campaigning in the bag.
I would reccomend the Obama administration be proactive about this. Don't begin the campaign today, you still have lots of work to be done, However, get your message out. Rallies, appearences, youtube videos? Rekindle the fire of 2008 and get your soldiers out there (like me!). Plan ahead, and by 2012 maybe the national conversation could be a little more...informed?

Don't worry too much about bipartisanship. Hold out your hand for them, sure. But expect it to be swatted. Until the republicans feel like ACTUALLY discussing issues, actually coming up with real-world solutions, don't let them take control of the discussion. Those of us who know things like tax cuts for millionaires actually INCREASES the deficit can see right through their concers about fiscal responsiblity (laughable!). Democrats are still the adults, as far as I'm concerned.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

So I guess this is election night..

Forgot about this blog thing. Suck! It's cool though.

I'll admit. I wasn't optimistic about the house. Nancy Pelosi must be slamming her hands on the table with frustration (or maybe her gavel?) as Democrats seemingly refused to run on their accomplishments of the past year and a half. I'd go ahead and list those, but my fingers are tired from posting on facebook all night (read that as, annoying my less-than-political friends with constant updates throughout the night). http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ is a fun little profanity-laden highlight reel of Obama's first 2 years.

I'm just going to go out on a limb and say Pelosi had more balls than anyone else in the democratic leadership. She got things done, and didn't give a shit what anyone thought. TRUE FACTZ.

Having said that, I love Obama. I'll vote for him in 2012. And having the Republicans in control of the house might turn out well for the President's re-election campaign (which, as we know begins...now). Now the Republicans can be the ones who have to answer to their own obstructionism. I would love to see Mitch McConnells petty attitude bite them right in the ass.

This could be seen as the ramblings of a democrat in denial about the republican wave that just went through. Not so. I realize it was a terrible night for Dems. It happens. Every midterm after a new prez. takes office, actually.

More locally, Tim Eyman. He is a total douche. Like really, what is WRONG with this guy?

Washington is going to have a hard time funding ANYTHING thanks to the fact that now in order to change tax law, state congressmen and women have to find a way to a 2/3 majority. and we saw how well the constant presence of a filibuster worked nationally. ugh ugh ugh. don't even get me started on 1098. the keyword there is "greed".

I'm glad Harry Reid held on. Meaning, i'm glad the tea party found someone batshit crazy enough to lose to Reid, who's approval ratings are embarassingly low. No word on if Angle is going to make "lemonade" out of this situation...that's not funny, nevermind.

Hold on tight, Patty. I'll write about that race tomorrow.


Love, Camille